top of page

Notable Court Decisions

At Bright Law, the vast majority of our matters are resolved without the need for a court hearing — a testament to our commitment to practical, efficient advocacy. Of the cases that do proceed to a hearing, only some result in written decisions from the courts.

This page highlights some of those notable cases in which we participated, where written reasons were issued. Each entry includes a brief summary of the decision, along with a direct link to the full judgment. Over time, we’ll be expanding these summaries with deeper commentary and insights to reflect not only the legal significance of each case, but also the strategies that helped shape the outcome.

Xu v. Jin 2025 BCSC 307 — BC Supreme Court judicial review overturning an RTB finding under the Residential Tenancy Act, Bright Law residential tenancy lawyers

Xu v. Jin, 2025 BCSC 307

Issue: Overturning a finding that a landlord's evidence of occupancy was insufficient

Savage v. Lu 2025 BCSC 355 — BC Supreme Court judicial review upholding a landlord's possession order under the Residential Tenancy Act, Bright Law

Savage v. Lu, 2025 BCSC 355

Issue: Upholding a possession order after a tenant withheld rent over alleged disrepair

Shigani v. Taylor 2024 BCSC 979 — BC Supreme Court judicial review on whether an RTB arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction, Bright Law residential tenancy lawyers

Shigani v. Taylor, 2024 BCSC 979

Issue: Whether an arbitrator's compensation award should be set aside for conflating the good-faith and stated-purpose requirements.

Kong v. Lee 2021 BCSC 606 — BC Supreme Court decision defending a landlord at the Residential Tenancy Branch, Bright Law tenancy lawyers Vancouver

Kong v. Lee, 2021 BCSC 606

Issue: Defending a landlord's monetary award on judicial review under the patent-unreasonableness standard.

Sull v. Trevitt 2024 BCSC 1463 — BC Supreme Court judicial review on procedural fairness at the Residential Tenancy Branch, Bright Law

Sull v. Trevitt, 2024 BCSC 1463

Issue: Procedural fairness when an award exceeds the amount the tenant claimed

Sull v. Trevitt 2025 BCSC 1366 — BC Supreme Court decision on a second judicial review of a reconsidered RTB ruling, Bright Law tenancy lawyers Vancouver

Sull v. Trevitt, 2025 BCSC 1366

Issue: A second judicial review after reconsideration reaches the same result

Naderi v. Cheng 2026 BCSC 861 — BC Supreme Court judicial review setting aside a 12-month rent penalty under the Residential Tenancy Act, Bright Law

Naderi v. Cheng, 2026 BCSC 861

Issue: Setting aside a 12-month compensation award against a landlord where the arbitrator's reasons failed to explain the outcome.

Homax Real Estate Services v. Arde 2025 BCSC 2431 — BC Supreme Court judicial review on property manager liability under the Residential Tenancy Act, Bright Law

Homax Real Estate Services v. Arde, 2025 BCSC 2431

Issue: Whether a property manager named as "landlord" is liable for s. 51 compensation

Zadeh v. Yao, 2025 BCSC 2215

Issue: Overturning an order of possession obtained without disclosing a rent-suspension agreement to the adjudicator.

Sull v. Trevitt 2026 BCCA 163 — BC Court of Appeal decision in a long-running residential tenancy dispute, Bright Law

Sull v. Trevitt, 2026 BCCA 163

Issue: The dispute reaches the Court of Appeal

Sandhu v. Gill 2024 BCSC 412 — BC Supreme Court decision on the burden of proof in a Residential Tenancy Branch dispute, Bright Law

Sandhu v. Gill, 2024 BCSC 412

Issue: Where the burden of proof lies in a good-faith landlord's-use dispute

Loh v. Niary 2024 BCSC 1583 — BC Supreme Court judicial review setting aside an RTB decision for denial of a fair hearing, Bright Law

Loh v. Niary, 2024 BCSC 1583

Issue: Denial of a fair hearing when an arbitrator cuts off the landlord's response

Panaich v. Martin 2023 BCSC 2149 — BC Supreme Court judicial review overturning a 12-month rent award for bad-faith eviction, Bright Law tenancy lawyers

Panaich v. Martin, 2023 BCSC 2149

Issue: Overturning a 12-month compensation award by substituting the court's own decision

Momeni v. Percy 2024 BCCA 77 — BC Court of Appeal decision on a single valid ground for eviction under the Residential Tenancy Act, Bright Law

Momeni v. Percy, 2024 BCCA 77

Issue: One valid ground for a for-cause notice makes an order of possession mandatory

Eskandarzadeh v. Nate 2025 BCSC 1236 — BC Supreme Court judicial review on landlord failure to reoccupy after a two-month eviction notice, won by Bright Law residential tenancy lawyers

Eskandarzadeh v. Nate, 2025 BCSC 1236

Issue: Failure to reoccupy after a mutually agreed end of tenancy

Wong v. Christou 2025 BCSC 1212 — BC Supreme Court judicial review setting aside a 12-month rent penalty under the Residential Tenancy Act, Bright Law

Wong v. Christou, 2025 BCSC 1212

Issue: Setting aside a 12-month compensation award made without proper notice

Please note that all of the information and resources outlined on our website are intended to be legal information only and should not be interpreted as legal advice. For legal advice, please contact our office or book a consultation. 

Please click here for our Privacy Policy or here for our Disclaimer.

© 2026 by Arash Ehteshami Law Corporation dba Bright Law. 

Tenancy Lawyers for British Columbia

300 - 171 Water Street, Vancouver, B.C.  V6B 1A7

Tel: 604-207-5542 / Fax: 604-207-5545

  • White LinkedIn Icon

Trusted by landlords, tenants, and property managers across BC.

bottom of page